• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Start with proven experience, not the number of logos on the website. Request three or four engagements that match your technology stack, and then ask specifically which is better laravel or node js engineers actually built it. A serious vendor next.js development agency is happy to connect you with the tech lead. Vague answers at this stage usually mean you are talking to a reseller.

The agreement needs more attention than the sales deck. Three clauses do most of the work: assignment of intellectual property, the NDA, and notice periods and handover. All the work product must transfer to you as it is paid for, together with documentation, pipelines and deployment scripts. Watch for any clause that keeps framework code in the vendor's hands, symfony vs spring boot comparison since it is usually exactly the piece that locks you in.

Ask where their numbers come from. An honest estimate is accompanied by the assumptions behind it, a task-level breakdown and a range rather than a single number. A fixed price works only when the specification is complete; when the scope is still moving the vendor php development agency prices the risk in and you pay for uncertainty either way. A time-and-materials model puts the risk on your side, so it needs visible weekly reporting and a spending cap.

The delivery process matters more than team size. Ask how change requests are handled, who writes the acceptance criteria and what the QA setup looks like. A team should be able to demonstrate running software rather than status reports. Acceptance criteria in writing stay your only real protection against an argument at delivery time.

Finally, plan for the handover while the relationship is still good. Ask that the source repository lives under your account from the first commit, and that documentation is updated as part of the work. A provider confident in its own work accepts it without argument; a long negotiation over it says quite a lot.