• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A number produced without questions should be treated as a warning, not a service level. Any serious team will come back with clarifying questions before any number: about integrations. A vendor that commits to a figure with no clarification is working from a template, hire react native experts and custom app development that guess becomes a change request later — at your expense.

Look out for a gap between the people you meet and the people who will code. Ask for hire dedicated developers specific people rather than roles in the agreement, with a provision that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A team that will only describe abstract roles and refuses to name individuals is keeping the right to assign anyone it likes.

Require the source repository from the first week. A team that shows nothing between demos expects you to take delivery on faith. Regular commits and pull requests reveal the actual pace far better than any status report. The same holds for the build and deployment setup: if there is no pipeline, promises about quality are just talk.

Ambiguous wording in the contract around IP is rarely a formality. The document must state explicitly that the code, designs and documentation transfer to your business as they are paid for. Check also the jurisdiction and the payment schedule: a large upfront payment with no deliverable attached takes away any leverage you would otherwise keep.

Lastly, examine communication. Ask how many hours you will share with your working day, which named person is expected to answer your questions and outsource php development within what time. Four hours of overlap is usually enough; no overlap stretches every clarification into a twenty-four hour round trip. Careless writing in the sales phase does not improve later.