• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Begin with proven experience, not the size of the portfolio. Request two or enterprise web application development three engagements that match your stack, and then ask specifically which engineers actually built it. A serious vendor will put you on a call with the engineers. Answers that name nobody at this stage generally mean the delivery team is not the team you were shown.

The paperwork deserves a slower read than the pitch. Three clauses do most of the work: assignment of intellectual property, the NDA, and symfony web development company exit terms and handover. Every artifact has to transfer to you as it is paid for, including documentation, pipelines and deployment scripts. Be careful with language that leaves framework code outside the transfer, since it is usually exactly the piece that locks you in.

Ask how they estimate. An honest estimate arrives with a list of assumptions, a task-level breakdown and a best case and a worst case. A fixed-bid deal works only when the specification is complete; when the scope is still moving the vendor prices the risk ai in software outsourcing and you fund the buffer regardless. A time-and-materials model shifts that risk to you, so it demands a sprint cadence, demos and a budget cap.

How the work is run matters more than the number of developers. Find out what happens when the scope changes, who writes the acceptance criteria and what the QA setup looks like. A mature team can walk you through a live build at the end of each sprint. Written acceptance criteria stay the practical protection against an argument at delivery time.

Before signing, consider the day you no longer need this vendor before it becomes urgent. Insist that the code repository lives on infrastructure you own from day one, nearshore vs offshore outsourcing and that documentation is written as you go rather than left to the end. A partner who is comfortable with this says yes immediately; hesitation here tells you quite a lot.