• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

That's a trillion instances heavier than all of humanity. You would repeat this thousands of occasions over the course of tens of millions of years. All of it relies upon how fussy you are about how the Earth seems afterwards, after all. Suppose that there have been ten billion individuals (another overestimate - there are about 6.4 billion at the time of writing). The most obvious major disadvantage with this technique is that proper now there aren't even theories as to how you may possibly construct rocket engines of the kind proposed right here. The key problem here is figuring out how to choose up large items of continental plate with out breaking them. The principle right here is way the same, with the railguns behaving considerably like discretized variations of thrusters, offering instantaneous changes in velocity versus sustained steady change. Atmospheric considerations are ignored right here since it's far more vitality-efficient to manually take away the Earth's ambiance, transfer the planet, and reinstall it. Wait long enough, and the photo voltaic wind blowing the sail outwards will take the Earth outward too, what is billiards since the 2 are gravitationally sure collectively!

And lastly, suppose that they all jumped at exactly the identical prompt, which of course they will not, seeing because the time difference between the fastest watch and the slowest will likely be over five minutes. Note that the Earth doesn't and won't behave like a strong, rigid billiard ball beneath such huge impacts as these. Suppose all people on the planet weighed 100kg (which is an overestimate, 70kg is more prefer it, probably much less). Ceres, the solar system's largest asteroid, has lower than 1/40,000th the mass of Earth; the Moon, a mere 1/80th. These objects are the heaviest you're probably to seek out - there are heavier moons and whole planets you possibly can consider using, however to be honest from this perspective it seems to be more like utilizing a succession of tons of, hundreds or tens of thousands of smaller asteroid impacts could be a better guess. If there was some technique to electrically charge the Earth, by dumping numerous identically charged particles onto the Earth or simply ionizing particles already on Earth - a large amber rod would possibly perhaps be in order - then we might use magnetic fields to drive the planet in the route we wished it to go.

Better, you can use many, many asteroids one after the opposite in a steady stream, and minimize down the full time considerably. It is feasible to use a photo voltaic sail to steer the Earth into the Sun. Construct an enormous photo voltaic sail with a major mass. Direct matter propulsion. Same technique as above, simply utilizing gigantic mass drivers/railguns to fire enormous quantities of matter away from Earth, as a substitute of a rocket exhaust. Billiards method. Clonk the Earth with something massive and heavy, inflicting it to change course. Let me emphasize the words "big", "heavy" and "clonk". Maybe Earth is about to hit an asteroid. You can reuse the same asteroid again and again, looping it round a couple of gasoline giants and back to realize heaps extra kinetic vitality from those fuel giants in the same manner that Earth simply gained velocity from the rock. It will get higher. Even assuming the Earth did move by some important distance when all people jumped, simply think about it: it'd move right again once more! Maybe you wish to destroy it: a major variety of strategies for destroying the Earth involve moving it by some substantial quantity. Alternatively, because the Earth's angular kinetic vitality is negligible compared to its orbital kinetic power, you might consider diverting a relatively small quantity of sources to simply stopping the Earth from spinning in any respect, earlier than starting the main mission.

Moving the Sun is about 6 orders of magnitude tougher than moving the Earth but the Sun is repeatedly emitting power which may be productively harnessed for this function. This structure wouldn't be in orbit around the Sun, but static, remaining aloft utilizing the radiation strain of catching and reflecting solar power. With half of the Sun's radiation blocked/reflected in the other course, the Sun now has a net thrust upwards (i.e. in the path of the "hat"). Rather than simply bouncing off, the thing destroyed a lot of both itself and Earth, causing an enormous spray of matter to be hurled off from the impression point; this matter coagulated into what's now the Moon. Suppose that they all jumped ten metres in the air (a huge overestimate, fifty centimetres is extra likely and probably much less). This may be employed to move the Sun and Earth in tandem to a spot where the Earth can extra simply be destroyed. Direct rocket propulsion. Build gigantic, possibly nuclear upward-pointing rocket furnaces, maybe one, possibly four, possibly 1,000,000, whatever you may funds for. Build an enormous lightweight "hat" for the Sun, which catches the Sun's rays.